Authors Speak Out Column

Authors Speak Out - Selah Janel

Broke Characters

One of my favorite things about writing and reading books is the infinite amount of character personalities I get to explore. I love the possibility a person or creature can represent, so it’s disturbing to me to see the growing trend of protagonists who are likeable and not much else. I don’t know if this is a carryover from the young adult or some romance genres, or if people are plain afraid to branch out a little with their leading men and ladies. I don’t know if we’re reaching a stage where readers don’t respond well to flawed characters or if authors are afraid to distance readers, but I personally find it annoying.

Here’s my deal: I’m not perfect. I don’t want to read about perfect characters because that just makes me feel disconnected and, honestly, slightly inferior. It’s fine if a character is likeable – they don’t need to be a disturbing maniac – but if that’s their major or only personality trait, the plot becomes a bunch of stuff happening to them while they try to keep up. There’s nothing wrong with that, but eventually if a person doesn’t mature or grow, it gets really old, repetitive, and, frankly, juvenile.

Granted, things can swing the opposite way, as well. Broken characters are great because they give us a chance to see them redeemed and put back together. However, a character that’s completely irredeemable or who has more issues than Cosmo that are constantly, constantly, CONSTANTLY coming up in the exact same way just to provide drama? No, thanks. There’s drama and there’s angst for angst’s sake. It’s a tight balancing act, to be sure, but I believe it can be pulled off.

As a reader, the majority of the stories I connect with have protagonists with problems. The Greek heroes were getting up to all sorts of unsavory practices, fairy tale heroes and heroines aren’t always the brightest bulbs in the socket, and as larger-than-life as characters like Batman can be, their personal problems always come back to haunt them and always make things interesting. I think it’s important for us to not always like the characters we read, or to have to choose or defend why we like them as thinking, feeling readers.

As an author, I love the challenge of writing characters with quirks I may not personally agree with. I’ve even had a few protagonists that I completely disliked until I really got a chance to figure out why they were making the decisions they did. I think it’s become a weird misconception that authors secretly always write themselves into their protagonists to a certain degree, or at least agree with them, and that’s not the case at all…or else I have way more in common with anxious trolls, 1800s-era vampires, or demonic rock stars than I realized.

We all have our shortcomings, our selfish moments, our anxieties, our traumas, our moments we’re not proud of. My personal belief is that everyone you encounter has a story, and it’s more than likely that there’s at least one chapter in it that’s not so pleasant. What’s more, is that there’s nothing wrong with that. That’s how we develop empathy for each other and the stories we immerse ourselves with, it’s how we learn how to grow and develop as people, how we can find the ability to see something heroic in ourselves, despite or because of our flaws. How can we begin to understand that we can do awesome things no matter what, if the idea we hold up is a cardboard, bland, perfect nicey-nice protagonist? While I understand wanting to write perfect versions of life, it’s a shame that we’re shying away from using that as a way to enrich our stories.

So what about you out there in Readerland? Do broken characters drawn you in or turn you off? Is there a “right” way to write flawed characters, or a point where things get to be too much and turn you off? Who’s your favorite flawed character, and why?

About Selah Janel

Author Selah Janel

Author Bio:

Selah Janel has been blessed with a giant imagination since she was little and convinced that fairies lived in the nearby state park or vampires hid in the abandoned barns outside of town. The many people around her that supported her love of reading and curiosity probably made it worse. Her e-books The Other Man, Holly and Ivy, and Mooner are published through Mocha Memoirs Press. Lost in the Shadows, a collection of short stories celebrating the edges of ideas and the spaces between genres was co-written with S.H. Roddey. Her work has also been included in The MacGuffin, The Realm Beyond, Stories for Children Magazine, The Big Bad: an Anthology of Evil, The Grotesquerie, and Thunder on the Battlefield. Olde School is the first book in her new series, The Kingdom City Chronicles, and is published through Seventh Star Press. She likes her music to rock, her vampires lethal, her fairies to play mind games, and her princesses to hold their own.

Connect with Selah

| Website | Twitter | Facebook | Goodreads | Books by Selah Janel | Reviews of Selah’s Books |

About Site Hostess

16 comments

  1. Broken can be really touching, as long as they don’t wallow for angst’s sake alone…

  2. Great article! I like quirky characters but I don’t care for helpless, dependent ones. I like for characters to be flawed just like I am but also learn from their mistakes as I try to do.

    • Thanks, Betty! I completely agree. there has to be some growth and development to make the flaws worthwhile and relatable or else it’s just unnecessary drama

  3. I like my characters to be real. Some people in real life are completely freaking broken and others have minor character defects. Then there are those in our lives who present as flawless, though they have issues too. As long as a character is real/believable I will enjoy them. Too much of one side of the scale or the other can be annoying UNLESS you have a really good back story as to why they are that way. Great topic Selah!

    • thanks, Rachel! I totally agree - it’s all about keeping things in line with the story and keeping a good balance, unless the point is to show someone really going off the rails, and even then you have to have a deft hand at how that’s portrayed. I love characters that I can relate to, and I suppose I get irritated by heroines that just need to take their glasses off to be perfect or any sort of protagonist who’s main aspect is that their nice. An issue near and dear to my heart, definitely!

  4. Nikki Noffsinger

    I don’t mind broken as long as it’s not cliche or reads like every other broken character.

    • very true - I think it’s important to back things up and make things work within the plot. Otherwise they’re just as boring as every other neat and tidy “nice” protagonist.

  5. I enjoy complex characters who despite their flaws have inner strength and the perseverance to overcome adversity. Flawed characters make a novel more interesting and realistic.

    • Totally agree, Bonnie! Thanks for chiming in! I always feel like there’s so much more to DO with that type of character than a more perfect one, too.

  6. Definitely hate a perfect character. With a flawed character you get to see them overcome their problems or at least attempt to. Makes them much more believable.

    • Definitely, Lisa. I like to feel hope for those characters, but I really like seeing their growth or at least how they’re handling what’s in front of them. Even if they’re not intensely likable, they can at least be interesting and induce empathy at some point.

  7. I don’t mind broken characters as long as the story is intriguing and there’s a point to the whole thing

  8. I agree with my peers above - I enjoy complex characters who despite their flaws have inner strength and the perseverance to overcome adversity.

  9. My favorite characters are deeply flawed and have to overcome the awful things that scared them.

  10. I would kick it one step further, a flawed anti hero are fun, but I guess they are being over done these days!